SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 155.82-1.3%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DanD who wrote (102352)5/28/2011 5:05:13 PM
From: pyslent1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 197337
 
I predicted the first iPhone would be a disaster without 3G, but I was wrong. It did pretty well for a $400-600 phone.

As for your pretty chart, yes, the iPhone 3G was a much better device, and yes, 3G was one of the many reasons why.

My original point was that adding 3G would not have been sufficient to have make the Nokia Communicator a commercial success. Furthermore, that 3G wasn't even necessary to make the iPhone a commercial success. Do you disagree with either or both of those statements?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News