Well, SuperDave, let's take a look at this behavior. He asks a lot of questions, loaded with an anti-RMIL spin, and then gives people a hard time if they don't answer to his liking. Well, I asked him a simple yes or no question in order to try and establish what his motives are for spending so much time here. Instead of answering, he indicated he was rolling on the floor laughing at my question, and then implied I was trying to impersonate an SEC attorney. Then Kugler accused me of harassing s martin, and said I was behaving like an idiot and that I should give it a rest. Kugler then suggested that I was trying to hide something by not making my personal information available on this discussion forum.
Well, all I did was ask a very simple question, and I tried to do it as politely as possible. Why couldn't he just answer yes, no, or no comment? Why the need to attack my character instead of answering the question. Kugler has asked question after question in order to try and uncover dirt about the company, or some kind of shady motives behind the shareholders' support of the compay. I would expect that someone so into asking questions wouldn't attack me so harshly for asking one simple yes or no question. If s martin isn't affiliated with Mork, he could have simply given me a "no" answer, and I would have accepted it. If he chose not to answer, he could have given me a "no comment" answer, and I would have accepted that. However, I was insulted by implications about my character instead of receiving a simple answer to a simple question.
I'll probably get flamed for bringing up this point again, but that's okay. I expect anything - anything but a simple answer to a simple question.
If my question was that ridiculous, and that laughable, why couldn't a yes or no answer be easily given instead of attacking me for asking it? The answer is yes, or it is no. |
