meathead, so the study is correct when they say the winner is dell on the p266, but the study is incorrect when they say the staff pc winner is deskpro 4000....
typical of you and the dellheads...and this was really my point since I don't quote those ragmag studies.,....they are junko.
I don't want to view it anyway, shape or form..
but, be consistant...
when you call off these stupid winners...call them all off.
I have people who can quote that same matrix and have it
cpq 9 and 6...
I never quoted the study, I just quoted the fact that the whole study wasn't quoted.
So, I think it just depends on the heads doing it. I know design engr's that would rate it the other way. I know design engrs that would say that dell and cpq's are both good paper weights and that's it..the issue is I'm realistic about it....
I'm afraid that you are too emotional about anything you do and I
couldn't trust any experiment you did....
At, least I have purchased millions of dollars of dells and cpq's where each was the best for the job....
At least I can call off pages of good things about dell and about cpq, and pages of things cpq and dell stinko in....
You see only the good in dell and the bad in cpq...
Completely incapable of learning anything.
YOu see everything tthrough rose colored glasses...
no objectivity at all......Not a very good trait in an engr.
NOw, all the other dell heads will just pat you on back...
right..go get him, righto...
But, it means zero.
It's a good thing that Dell agrees with me on most of the issues of improvement and not you.... and they are trying to approve on them too.
If you were running dell , then it would be la de da....nothing's wrong with dell and nothing needs fixing , march ahead guys , we are the greatest. |
