SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ron Struthers who wrote (26739)11/16/1997 6:34:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett  Read Replies (1) of 35569
 
Ron,

<,Again I stress you cannot expect every assay to come back the same whether it is .25 or 0.04. Different drill holes and samples will get different results. It is the average with appropriate cutoffs across many samples that count.>>

Do you know if they have tried the new assay on some of the IPM splits that yielded .25? If not, do you know why? I appreciate they would have not been COC samples, but they would at least have confirmed the grades IPM were touting in some of their previous PR's.

MB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News