SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Philosopher's Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: denizen48 who wrote (36)6/7/2011 9:02:19 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) of 71
 
<<Existentialism has nothing to do with science.>>

With all due respect, I do not think you understand existentialism. Which I have found is quite normal, even for the best and brightest.

It took me many years to understand it. I even got an A in a class in existentialism and didn't understand it at the time, looking back.

And neither Zen or existentialism can be explained directly. A person has to see it for themselves, within their minds eye. That is why Zen masters do not ever explain it; and also why high school kids cannot learn it.

Existentialism has everything to do with science, just as Zen does, in its own way. It has to do with seeing reality. Admittedly, in the end a subjective reality, but still reality as an abstract concept.

I told both my daughter's they cannot consider themselves fully educated until they understand existentialism. The good thing about existentialism is that whereas it points to a life without objective meaning, it also fortifies one's soul to know the truth of things. That we chimps can figure something out so abstract.

E.g. 99% of the world believe in some sort of religion. All religions are make believe myths. There has never been one single piece of scientific evidence to confirm any relious belief.

That is why Sartre titled his big book on existentialism Nausea: "the feeling you get in the pit of your stomach when you realize your own mortality" (paraphrased from memory a long time ago.)

That is why Darwin's Origin of Species was so important to the big thinkers. It explained the truth of where we came from and dispells the myths about creation;

oh, and why Kirkegaard could not have been an existentialist.

Many of my most educated friends still do not understand existentialism. My older daughter went to UC Berkeley and Loyola Law school and I don't think she really fully grasps it yet.

Not many do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News