Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (102860)	6/13/2011 11:28:49 PM
From: waitwatchwander	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 197283

Jeffery, I see you (and others?) may consider "Jacob's Patter" to be a reference to what Dr. Jacob's said. FYI, my reference to "Jacobs Patter" was not such, but a reference to the article entitled "Jacobs Patter" which was BS. Sometimes I find folks around here are just out to get me. My words and thoughts sure get twisted. Why that has to be is beyond my comprehension. Everyone has a right to see matters in ways that match their own beliefs. Appreciation of such differences is what use to make this thread of value. Times have changed. Bdazz, ---> disingenuous tactic huh??? Jefferies post was full of points from 5+ years past and this is an investment thread. Why is pointing that out disingenuous? I also have no clue as to what position you think I don't feel good about. I don't see Qualcomm as being as almighty as many others around here might. That is not because I see them failing to think straight but because I see them consistently been late delivering upon the expectations that they themselves set. I feel pretty good that that is a very valid position. I also don't criticise Qualcomm for not being in the ipad, at this time. I criticise Qualcomm for being the first to set expectations for always-on smartbooks and for being the last in getting adequate product delivered to our local stores. They do create vision for the industry but have always been late in getting their components into the visionary products. As I previously stated they do lead with HTC smartphones and LTE but have yet to deliver a whelming shelf presences within the wifi/3G tablet category. As you know, I own Qualcomm for their wireless vision and their enabling position within the industry. It is not that they are failing to perform on that front, but that their partnering efforts are not performing at my level of expectation which was created solely for closely following Qualcomm and the wireless industry for the last 20 years. They can do better. They always seem to be stumbling about in a reactionary manner addressing issues needing a fix rather than setting the pace with innovative and timely product delivery. This is especially true for app processors within the tablet category and early-on smart phones. Others obviously see that differently, so be it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next