International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GlobalMarine who wrote (26819)	11/16/1997 11:17:00 PM
From: Raye Derickson	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Welcome Rand!! Alot of what you say makes sense, but although IPM's approach costs time and technical resources, a degree of in-house verification & experimentation is wise. Companies can outsource to the extreme as well...a case MAY be Delgratia, and I did not follow their program very much, but they blamed the salting on an outside lab. This may be a poor example (as the problem may have arose in-house), but could it be if a contracted lab notices a low degree of in-house technical work/verification, then the temptation to screw with the results is increased? Comfortable in the fact all the DD's are trying things their own way! Best wishes, Raye

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next