SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Trader who wrote (14526)11/16/1997 11:35:00 PM
From: ypz  Read Replies (2) of 50167
 
We stared eye-ball to eye-ball and someone blinked
I shall leave it to the thread to decide who did blink.


Well, it appeared to me that Mr. Latif and Mr. Khoshnood
did blink. This, however, in no way, proved
the existence of the trade.

Nonetheless, it did show the following two points:

- The naiveness of Mr. Latif and Mr. Khoshnood - they put themselves
in a very disadvantageous position at a very early time.
Just think of the difficulty of obtaining authentic proof of
the trade.

- Possibly, your ingenuity in scaring away your opponents.
Well, ingenuity may be too much a word here; Most people
would have come up with the same solution if they could not
provide such proof because the only thing they may lose is a
fictious face on SI while the opponents might lose
thousands of dollars.

While one does not have the obligation of proving the existence
of his/her claimed trades on SI, I would certainly publish
my monthly brokerage statement to counterprove had my integrity
been so challenged unless, of course, the claimed trades
did not really exist.

Please note that this is NOT intended to restart the fire -
JMHO
.

Profitable trading to all, and back to lurking mode.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext