The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Torn who wrote (38946)	6/27/2011 2:33:17 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (2) of 46821

Torn, I had offered the non-NYT approved story - specifically because this thread generally only posts a specific meme. Energy independence would be best served by looking at all possibilities - not discounting any one of them for religious reasons. The push toward EV's is religious/political. The use of natural gas for just electricity is also political. Because we have created an artificial market for electricity - we may have created a bubble - but that doesn't mean that shale gas is a bad idea. Natural Gas as an automotive fuel is used extensively elsewhere. Use with fuel cells is new, but promising. Even if we just lookk at electricity production - Natural Gas is much better than coal from a pollution perspective. Most importantly it can be used in conjunction with renewals such as wind to provide smooth base power requirements. Gas turbines can be on-demand sources. But the 'no carbon' forces in the world make 'lower carbon' choices impossible. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next