International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Anne Lamb who wrote (27092)	11/17/1997 10:49:00 AM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Ann they can Bite Me. Did you read Struthers report? The grades that Batemen found were consistent with Aurics. (The samples that Batemen took were close to that of Aurics and they came out with the same numbers ...or close" To me that means if Batemen decided to twin Aurics areas where we got the good numbers (This is all Random) WE WOULD GET THE SAME RESULTS... OR NEAR. Also Batemens only been there a couple months. Give them some time. This is the Best news YET!!!! Well if we wnat to waste more time and money lets have Batemn twin Aurics holes and report those high grades, will that make us feel better (Yea maybe a little) or lets have them do that backlog of samples and get an accurate picture. Or do your own math and split Aurics and Batemens numbers. Those numbers sound GREAT TO ME. Mr. Struthers although you did not have a chance to comment on my post to you yesterday regarding Auric and Batemen, Id say I was pretty close.. YOUR KUNG FU IS STILL THE BEST Your Friend, Don Watson

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next