International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TrueScouse who wrote (27114)	11/17/1997 11:56:00 AM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) of 35569

I want to be clear here that its not that i think any less of what we have at IPM..i think we have the goods..I, like Donald, think there were a million ways to make this PR without hanging us out to dry..one sentence!! like.this is NOT what we feel is representive of the grade..etc..anything..when Naxos reported same type of numbers they also put in non chain custody..if IPM feels those numbers are still good..they could have also..as it appears to me..they are saying that .03 is it.Hope they do some repair work quick. WHile i'm at it..the PR for MGAU was so drab that no one took time to realize that it was great news!! they are , last i checked, down to .71.. no reason for that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next