International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (27099)	11/17/1997 12:08:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Claude, I might be wrong, but I don't believe that the announcement said anything about Bateman confirmation of fire assay. I believe the fire assay samples are IPM's own samples which they did COC and security on and then sent to a lab which was able to do fire assay. We just don't know which lab. It would appear that Bateman subjected two samples from IPM to a nominated process. The concentrates from these tests were sent to a lab of Bateman's choosing. The results confirm Gold and Platinum but no numbers are given. This is in line with the last PR which says the consultants sent "concentrates to lab of their choosing" I believe that in the announcement they are referring to two seperate events, fire assays by independent registered AZ lab and special recovery process overseen by one or more consultants. Tim Hall

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next