International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Donald Watson, Jr. who wrote (27115)	11/17/1997 12:14:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Don > This whole things sucks, the only reason we tanked at all is because IPM had the Balls to stand up to Auric and Say "Your not Going to Rape us for the goods" < Excellent point. However, I think it's looking like BD was also a screwor and IPM was the screwee. If Bateman could do it that quick, why didn't BD? Where was BD when the news relese was being prepared last Friday? Obviously the shorters were privy to some inside information. Did it come from BD? I heard a rumor one time that they didn't want their name associated any longer with IPM because of what it might do to their reputation and the impact that might have on their "old fashioned" type clients (probably MGL, LLL, NCW, TNR, etc.). Looks to me like IPM might have career adjusted BD in a very quite and classy way. Geezeeeeeeeee I just read the Globe via Bloombergski IPM news on the CSW. Excuse me Claude and other conservatives and yesterdayers, but I am getting tired of news distorition, shorters, the VSE, people who use these techniques to FIGHT change, etc.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next