SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cirrus who wrote (96041)7/5/2011 1:34:04 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 149317
 
Tea Partiers split over debt strategy

By Erik Wasson - 07/04/11 05:24 AM ET

Tea Party activists are split between opposing any new increase to the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling and tying an increase to spending cuts, caps and a balanced-budget amendment.

On one side is the Tea Party Patriots group, which is urging its supporters to sign a “no debt increase” pledge. On the other side are Tea Party-related groups with significant GOP establishment backing, such as FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity. Tea Party Express has joined this side

These groups have joined a coalition calling for “Cut, Cap and Balance” to be the condition for a raising of the debt ceiling.

This approach, developed by the Republican Study Committee, calls for “substantial cuts in spending that will reduce the deficit next year and thereafter,” “enforceable spending caps that will put federal spending on a path to a balanced budget” and congressional passage of a balanced-budget amendment.

Six months ago, many freshman House GOP members were calling for no debt-ceiling increase, while the White House position was a “clean” increase.

In a sense, both positions have moved toward a compromise. The White House in April convened the Biden debt talks as an acknowledgment that some deficit controls would be needed to get a debt-ceiling increase. On the right, most groups and members of Congress have moved toward exchanging spending cuts for a debt-ceiling increase.

FreedomWorks this week established its own “Tea Party Debt Commission” to come up with a plan to meet the "cut, cap and balance" framework.

The commission is to propose a way to balance the budget within no more than 10 years without raising taxes. Its 18 members will come from key electoral states and will make a proposal by the end of 2012.

FreedomWorks spokesman Adam Brandon said that even if the "cut, cap and balance" framework is adopted by Aug. 2, the long-term debt problem will still need to be addressed with specific policies. This is the reason for the debt commission.

He said there is no “unified” Tea Party debt-ceiling position, although the activists agree in prioritizing shrinking the deficit. Brandon said the Tea Party Patriots position of “just say no” is flawed. “I just don’t think it is very realistic,” he said.

He noted that breaching the debt ceiling would mean an overnight cut in federal spending of 40 percent. However, he added, using the debt ceiling to get items like a balanced-budget amendment would be a “sea change” in public policy.

During a recent conference with grassroots leaders, he said activists were enthusiastic about "cut, cap and balance" and the Tea Party Debt Commission. Along with the Republican Study Committee, he noted, FreedomWorks was instrumental in formulating the "cut, cap and balance" approach.

The group has its own proposals, such as eliminating the departments of Education and Housing and Urban Development, but wants to use its commission hearings to solicit its members input on which specific cuts are most popular.

This carefully developed plan will be highly useful in the 2012 elections, Brandon said. It needs about six months to complete thorough field hearings, he explained.

Tea Party-related group Americans for Prosperity signed onto the "cut, cap and balance" pledge a few weeks ago.

read more............

r20.rs6.net
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext