The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (34561)	7/7/2011 6:58:46 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) of 36921

>consensus doesn't mean anything in science. LOL, so we shouldn't rely on scientific cocensus? So what you're saying is that the current scientific concensus on anything is meaningless? So gravity is just a theory and scientists don't have a fully certain understanding of it, yet if you jump off a building you'll certainly feel it's effects. Same situation with AGW. Scientist are just as certain of AGW as gravity, yet they don't understand fully all the short term variations in climate and weather. This is what your buddy Maurice was balking at that the current models fail to predict short term variations in climate. Well long term the models are valid. This is what Maurice fails to point out. And we know that the long term consequences of AGW will be dire. And we'll have people to blame like Maurice for our failure to stem it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next