SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch
AAPL 255.48-1.1%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rnsmth who wrote (6453)7/9/2011 9:34:03 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) of 32692
 
After losing to Amazon, Apple loses playlist patent suit, must pay $8M
July 9, 2011 11:15 AM PDT
by Michelle Meyers
news.cnet.com

A federal jury in Eastern Texas, the same district where Lodsys has filed all of its patent suits, has ruled against Apple in a case accusing the iPod maker of infringing on patents for downloadable playlists.

Bloomberg first reported Friday on the verdict requiring Apple to award $8 million in damages to the patent holder, Personal Audio, a nonpracticing entity--meaning it licenses patents but doesn't actually have any other business. The jury found Apple liable for infringing on the patents and upheld their validity, Bloomberg reported, citing Personal Audio's lawyer, Ron Schutz.

Personal Audio, a patent licensing company with an office Beaumont, Texas, filed the case in 2009 seeking $84 million in damages. The U.S. patents in question are No. 6,199,076, "Audio program player including a dynamic program selection controller" and No. 7,509,178, "Audio program distribution and playback system," according to intellectual-property tracking blog FOSS Patents. Other defendants initially included in the case were Sirius XM Radio, Coby Electronics, and Archos, but they all settled in May and July of 2010.

FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller shed further light on the ruling by noting that at a mere $8 million in damages, Apple "only has a limited incentive to appeal the decision." But the company could appeal in hopes of negotiating a discounted settlement.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment about a potential appeal.

Mueller likened the case to one targeting iOS developers filed by Lodsys, also a nonpracticing entity that chooses to work with a court known to be more sympathetic to those in its business. In May, Lodsys sent letters to Apple iOS and Android developers notifying them that their mobile apps were infringing on four patents. Lodsys sought a percentage of each application developer's revenue, even threatening to go back to collect income that had already been earned. Apple responded that its licensing agreement with Lodsys covers its developers, a claim that Lodsys has rejected.

Of course, for Apple, the patent war goes both ways. Of recent note, Apple is seeking to keep four of Samsung's newest mobile devices from being made or sold within the U.S, in a patent battle between the two tech giants. And Apple has entered into a consortium of companies buying 6,000 patents and patent applications from the bankrupt Canadian telecom equipment maker Nortel.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext