The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (34815)	7/13/2011 7:28:39 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) of 36917

>Hansen's changes/adjustments to historical temperature records are NOT peer reviewed. Total utter nonsense, as usual, the datasets are published in peer reviewed articles. The blogs are just rantings from the "head in the sand" set. What do you think???? That NASA/GISS is some backwoods amateur outfit. EVERYTHING they publish has very high optics. You're discrediting them to fit with your biases. You have to go back to the 2007, 1987 articles to get explanations on their changes. There's always reasons for adjusting the data record. You don't understand science, in that they are always refining and improving the record. Just because the results are what Bummar doesn't like, doesn't make them fraudulent.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next