International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (27249)	11/17/1997 5:15:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) of 35569

<< In a previous post, you stated you had never seen a project where recovery grades exceeded assay grades ... and were in fact usually slightly less. >> <<Just curiousity ... but how is that statement reconciled with the following post? ...>> What I said is true..out of several hundred companies (and operating mines) I have examined..I have never seen a project where recovery grades exceeded assay grades. Recoveries can be as much as 25% lower than assays. Now, I didn't say that it is impossible and that no mines ever will recover more than assays... I am told the Emperor mine is an exception... quite possible. Maybe there are others. Lets say that 99% of them are recovering less than the average assayed grade. I stand buy my comment.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next