Imperial Metals (IPM.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Imperial Metals (IPM.T)

IPM 1.940

+1.0%

Nov 7 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Italian Investor who wrote (909)	8/18/2011 2:26:02 PM
From: refugee investor	Read Replies (1) of 1366

Last week Barrons dragged the roundtable out and MacAllister said he had never seen the banks so cheap, that you would make good money on BAC if you had five years. That seems right. I was tempted to buy some more last week as a s-t trade, but did not. Based on the call I think things are not quite as good as Moynihan hoped in the spring at the AGM, mostly because their capital requirements turned out to be higher, and mortgage costs too. But things are of course not nearly as bad as people fear. If there is another big recession then they will be in trouble because they will not earn enough to generate those high reserves that the gov wants and they would have to water down the stock again. Imp keeps chugging along. The most recent estimates from analysts give a share target from 35-60.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next