International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: HungryLion who wrote (27489)	11/18/1997 8:15:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Kitty, you guys come in waves, do you work in the same office? I suspect that Jensen will say that he is waiting for a check from the refiner since the market sent Furlong there. The final chapter of this story is yet to be told IMO. I have seen experimental result from Hewlett (Maxam's consultant) where "working" the ore gets 0.2-0.3 Au from assayed 0.05 Au Maxam dirt. BRX is in that same general area and reported similar values on non-COC work earlier this year. Those values are consistent enough to convince me that there are higher values at BRX than what COC assay reported. My concern has always been if they could extract those higher OPT metals economically. That jury is still out, the final story is far from being told. It's a shame there was all the distraction with the AZ rock museum, but I guess that's to be expected with so much at stake. The bulls will get another chance and I'm sure you shorts will nip at their heels. It sure is fun.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next