Big Dog's Boom Boom Room Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (156457)	9/4/2011 10:32:33 PM
From: Webster Groves	13 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 206085

There is nothing wrong with the graph. Your allegations of inaccuracy have no basis in fact, but are more likely a result of prejudice. You interpret any measurement of increased CO2 levels in the atmosphere as being erroneous because they don't fit your world view. The Mauna Loa data does not say why the CO2 is increasing, just that it is increasing. There is no political slant to the data, so why add one to the interpretation, Mauna Loa is not an active volcano, why do you infer that it is ? It is true that science indicates that atmospheric CO2 was higher in the distant past, You seem to have no argument with that statement. You do not denigrate the scientists who state that inference. But for modern times, any measurement that indicates an increase in CO2 is called spurious or manipulated. Why is that ? The rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 in over the last 100 years is enormous. The measurements are relatively simple to do, and do not require a degree in political science to interpret. wg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next