SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 387.98+1.3%Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (79064)9/6/2011 8:46:15 AM
From: Ilaine1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 218085
 
>>Debt "slaves" is a lie.<<

Let me give you just one example.

In the US, if you have a judgment against you, it is legal for the lender to garnish your wages and take 25% of your takehome pay. In Virginia, the creditor can do this every six months, seamlessly, without any respite in between. And, at the contract rate of interest, which, can be as high as 29% -- actually there is no legal limit, this is just the highest I have seen so far.

So, just one example. One of my clients owed a vehicle loan of $5000 -- co-signed for a friend, who defaulted, the car was repossessed, the creditor got a judgment against the client and started garnishing her wages. Three years later, after having 25% of her takehome garnished every week, she now owes $8500. 25% of her takehome isn't enough to even get ahead at 29% interest. She is falling further and further behind

She's never going to be able to pay off that debt.

If that isn't slavery, I don't know what is.

Should she have foreseen this? I doubt very many people even know this is possible. I didn't until I saw it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext