SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dennis Roth who wrote (156417)9/9/2011 2:55:38 PM
From: Dennis Roth2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 206089
 
EIA Reports 64 Bcf Fill - Shedding the Light on Utica Valuation
9 pages, 10 exhibits
sendspace.com

Shedding the Light on Utica Value. This past week was marked with
activity that helped delineate Utica valuation. First, CNX announced a JV
with HES for a 50% working interest in CNX’s ~200k net acres in the Utica
for $593MM ($59MM at close and $534MM carry through 2016), or
~$4,500/acre (discounted). Looking at valuation from a different perspective,
60% of CNX’s Utica acreage is non-core and could be viewed as
~$2,000/acre for the 120k net acres of oil/dry gas (non-core) and ~$10,000–
12,000/acre (~$9,000/acre discounted) for the 80k net acres in the wet gas
window. HES also announced that it acquired 85k net acres in the Utica for
$750MM (~$8,800/acre), which is in-line with the second valuation method.
Finally, the Ohio Division of Mineral Management announced the first
completed Eastern Ohio Utica horizontal well (CHK’s well), which IP’d at
~6.5 MMcfe/d. This result was meaningfully below expectations (rumored to
have IP’d +20 MMcfe/d), but we note that it is still very early in the play.
Notably the well was completed in the Utica formation whereas operators
had discussed the Pt. Pleasant as being the more optimal target.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext