SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)
EDTA 0.000200+300.1%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Wolstenholme who wrote (1521)11/18/1997 11:31:00 PM
From: ksuave  Read Replies (2) of 2383
 
I guess it doesn't matter what we on SI think of Mr. Fink. What Judge Jones thinks is what matters.

A couple points I forgot last night:

Last Spring it was written here that Freidlich would get GIFT reporting soon, and I would be disappointed that he hasn't, but again, it doesn't really matter. I hope they file with the SEC immediately following a positive verdict, if one forthcomes. If the scope of the patent isn't upheld, who cares.

Also back last Spring when a ruling was expected to be forthcoming, Mel predicted that the case would generate a lot of publicity. So far, there hasn't really been a lot and I do hope that will change.

Finally, I have a question about the term "Markman Hearing". Is that a generic term or does it aplly to this case alone?

Back to cruisin' . . . Richard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News