Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CF Rebel who wrote (112610)	9/11/2011 7:53:45 PM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (2) of 224748

CF, See General Motors and Chrysler for instance. They should have been allowed to go bankrupt. Really? What would have happened to all the suppliers, their workers and those having financial dealings with these and other companies, let alone the economy? But, you are catching on: whatever side (public and private organizations or international) the issue is impacting, bargaining is based on the perception (real or imaginary) of POWER which each believes the other side has. The settlement is based on these perceptions. Mutual Deterrence, en.wikipedia.org is based on the the theory of perceived power. One side Camouflages and glorifies their actions as being the 100% right position while picturing the enemy as 100% wrong and evil. This is true of the other side as well. It is interesting the members of this site justify their perceptions and behavior glorifying their position while stating the organizing position is 100% evil. I just smile when such statements are made!! But, I understand why the poster takes such a position.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next