SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Netflix (NFLX) and the Streaming Wars
NFLX 104.35-1.2%Nov 21 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: engineer who wrote (566)9/20/2011 1:25:50 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 2280
 
Whether or not the CEO wants to understad it, you really have a "contract" between you and your subscribers which is predicated on the type of usage they have TODAY, not your projected need for cash flow. If you offer it for free, it has to be free, find another way to make revenue. If you offer the service for $9 a month, then it is $9 a month, unless you offer the user MORE FOR THE MONEY.

In fairness to NFLX, the streaming service, while having a more limited selection, is a much more valuable delivery method. While a single "exchange" of a DVD takes at least a couple days (limiting the number of viewings in a given month), the number of viewings via streaming can be much larger which is more expensive for NFLX. At the same time, while introducing the streaming product, it is reasonable for them to keep prices low. They HAVE expanded the streaming content, although it still is quite limited and unimpressive.

There is no contract. You can quit whenever you want; and NFLX can raise prices whenever IT wants.

It is totally predictable. All subscription content delivery services do it, because content costs always escalate.

I've long though NFLX was dirt cheap for what you get. I honestly don't know how anyone can stay in business selling anything at all for 10 bucks a month. Yet, these guys can make money at it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext