Cosigo Resources symbol CSG.v Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cosigo Resources symbol CSG.v

CSG.V 0.0750

0.0%

Dec 22 2:38 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: 3bar	9/30/2011 5:54:33 PM
	Read Replies (1) of 717

Called Cosigo today they were having a conference call so did not talk to Dennis . Called back and he was working on an " Information Circular " for AGM in Oct. that had to be in today . Will call back on Monday . There is the nagging ? of the MMI Tests and very high readings . Supposing a co in Africa has a background reading of 1 with a RR of 50 how does it compare to Cosigo's ? If Cosigo had a background of .01 and a RR of 100 , the ore depth/grade should be less than the African example . We do not know if we are comparing apples to apples . So as a historical # it may not be as significant as the high #s suggests . This is reason for some caution . However 1. 15 streams all have placer Gold . This implies large . 2. Estimated grade of material taken by artisanal miners by Colombian Govt was 150 to 200 g/t . That is in the 5 to 6 oz/t range which should give you some big #s on an MMI test . 3. Magnus Hagland and Joe Montgomery are experienced , seems likely they would added a sense of balance to any goofy testing . What would they have gained other wise . Fool themselves ? This MMI Geochemical Test can be fudged by some one willing to do it . Cheers !

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next