Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: skinowski who wrote (449070)	10/4/2011 10:22:01 AM
From: D. Long	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 794015

Yes, the choice IS government or more government, I'm afraid. That is, unless you are willing to watch people die in the street without help - because they failed to purchase insurance That is just another false alternative. Either people get all medical care, or they get none and people will be "dying in the streets." What ever did people do before the middle of the last century and government intervention in healthcare? They must have been dropping like flies. They lived to be 60 instead of 80. Well, I'm in the camp that doesn't believe society should be a cash cow to guarantee that extra 20 years for people who made poor choices in life and didn't get insurance or don't have the cash to pay out of pocket.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next