COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

-18.8%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (9494)	11/19/1997 3:18:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) of 22053

A caller to a talk show I listened to (consider the source ) put a particularlly sinister twist to the story that I have not heard mentioned elsewhere: He pointed out that the company who matched the girl up with the family paid the defense bills ( this is true ). He claimed that Scheck probably insisted that the jury not consider manslaughter because if the jury aquited, or found her guilty of 1st murder, then the company was off the hook for a civil suit. But if they found her guilty of manslaughter they would surely be hit with a giant civil suit. This guy ( who claimed to be a lawer ) said Scheck was acting in the best interest of his client ( the ou pair company ) and not the girl. I'm not a lawyer so I don't know how valid these points are. that

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next