Cosigo Resources symbol CSG.v Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cosigo Resources symbol CSG.v

CSG.V 0.0750

0.0%

Dec 22 2:38 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: 3bar	10/16/2011 10:54:24 AM
	of 717

Talked briefly with M. Haglund a few months back about the MMI results . He related how a geologist friend of his at another co was getting economic ore with a 30 RR MMI . He also mentioned that there was more MMI with the very high rates than the one at 12 thous mentioned here earlier . My views send long term Geologists into a frenzy as their conservatism does to me . Mine are based on practical experience from a guy like Shawn Ryan who has been widely quoted on taking the soil samples properly . Picking locations with reason . Plus comments from the Labs like SGS that say you can NEVER get a false positive with MMI testing done right . Or Geologist experts like Dr. Fedikow who say 100 RR is highly significant , that in general the higher and larger the MMI RR the greater the size of the mineralized zone . This is part of why they think the structure is very big or in this case deep . From their point of view they have pursued a lot of anomalies over their life and came up empty and so have learn to be sceptical . MMI though is a game changer eliminating some types of previous testing . Leading directly to drilling . Google mmigeochem and find some interesting reading for an hour or so .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next