SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RetiredNow who wrote (103229)10/23/2011 4:23:25 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 149317
 
And frankly, I am much more freaked out by GS than I am by say US bank. The average US bank is acting like the small child caught doing something bad and sent to the timeout corner. They are working to be better and regain their credibility However, GS and MS do not care what the rest of us think.........they will manipulate the system and screw whomever to get their profits.

Tejek,
you need to read more about these banks. Let's take Bank of America. That is not only the typical US bank, but defines the typical as the top tier banking institution in the country. They have a huge trading desk with something between $50 trillion and $70 trillion notional worth of derivatives. Say what? I thought you said that the revenue streams of GS and a typical bank are different? Well, when it comes to derivatives, those little thingies that caused the 2008 collapse, they are all in it eye-ball deep.

BAC is no longer a typical bank because it absorbed Merrill Lynch. Chase, JPM and BAC all took on one of the investment banks so they are hybrids now. I am talking the vast majority of banks in this country........not these three.

But it gets worse. Bank of America decided that the risk from their derivatives portfolio was too high. So what they just did in the last week was transfer $53 trillion of those derivatives over to their subsidiary that handles Mom and Pop depositors. Yep. You see the Mom and Pop depositors and that entire subsidiary is insured by the FDIC. So if they go belly up, everyone gets paid by the FDIC, which means the American taxpayer.

So what did Bank of America just accomplish? They transferred an enormous amount of risk from their own books to that of the taxpayers and they did it with the full throated support of Bernanke and the Fed, over the objections of the FDIC.

This is criminal behavior. It is stealing. It is also why after 20 years of banking with that institution, I removed all my money a month or so ago and have opted to bank with a local bank that doesn't get involved in those shenanigans.

So keep believing that you are a liberal man of the people, while you support the criminal banksters that are raping this country's taxpayers blind and causing all the economic mayhem we see today. And keep supporting Obama who is backing all these nefarious policies with his action, even as he whispers sweet nothings to the public.

You may be fooled, but I am not.


I don't support banks ripping off people at all. However, I would have been dismayed had Obama tried to dismantle banks in 2008 when the world was on the verge of a global depression. Apparently, you didn't take those circumstances very seriously. However, I did. And that's why your expectations for Obama don't make sense to me.

I firmly believe that corruption has gotten a stranglehold within our financial system. However, I don't see free markets as the solution but rather more regulation. In fact I believe free markets is what helped us get into the mess we are in.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext