Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (633414)	10/27/2011 12:49:02 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (3) of 1575622

>IPCC Climate Physicist Verifies Climate Model Predictions Are Worthless For Periods Longer Than A Decade That's not what the Authors, Latif and Keenlyside, stated at all. It's the other way around. Latif and Keenlyside clearly stated they don't predict short term precipitation anomolies or El Nino/La Nina oscillations. They also mentioned errors in prediction of LOCAL temperature varations of up to 10 C. The MODELs that the IPCC uses are for GLOBAL average temperatures. I don't think the models Latif and Keenlyside are refering too are the ones that the IPCC uses. The chaotic nature of WEATHER makes it IMPOSSIBLE to predict these things. Climate models are not meant to predict WEATHER. Doesn't mean they're not useful. There are limitations to the models, as there are in ALL models in existence. None are perfect. Again, the deniers are putting words in the scientists mouths and distorting reality (as usual). I could go on with other flaws in that "analysis". Nice try. As usual, you cut and paste from bullshit sources.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next