International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lew Green who wrote (27769)	11/20/1997 8:43:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Lew, <<After Monday's sickening reaction to the PR>> I have a different perspective "After Monday's sickening PR". So you're taking a vacation and leaving the thread for the shorts? Is that the way it works? When things get sour the super longs crawl in a hole? If there is still a case for IPM, now is the time for the longs to present it. Yes there are some really tough questions, but to abandon the stock to Chatters, Know-it-all-Bill, and the short cheerleaders seems irresponsible. We got into this situation, not because of the shorts, but rather the longs. Frankly, I don't like myself now having rah rah this stock to learn what the company hid. Maybe there is a rational explanation, like funding survival? Reasonable people will need reasonable explanations. Is there a long case for IPM? To leave the shorts in control with their spin is a big mistake IMO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next