Beat The Street With SI Traders Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: grusum who wrote (91230)	11/20/2011 4:10:27 AM
From: E. Charters	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 233785

You are assuming a constant surplus due to money that is provided over and above normal needs. hmmm.. well this is a complex equation in fact. This excess money will not hold its value for the simple reason that it is excess. Any times you have excess money to goods needed, the value of the money declines. A surplus producing economy is inherently unstable. I think you are referring to the efficiency of our technology producing more stuff, which gets consumed. This becomes needs. Everybody does not need ten cars, so we don't produce them. If we did, then cars would be worth only a few hundred dollars each. The argument that cars cost more than that to make does not hold, as if we could produce that many they would not cost that much. Value declines to equal the cost to produce very quickly. There is a conundrum. All the goods made by all the people have to equal the money available to buy the goods. But the worker makes less than the price of the goods. Where does the money come from to buy the goods? EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next