Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI)

GPGI 23.57

-2.9%

Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (354)	9/14/1996 6:39:00 PM
From: Eric Tai	of 14226

Jack, I just can't get away from the 81B question. Your calculation seem to make sense. Only one question: Did you know from Michael Thomas' report whether the 862 assays went to a 700 feet depth or they stopped at 350 feet or even less? If they only went to 350 feet or less, then the additional 100m tons from 350ft to 700ft should not be included in your calculation. If they went to 700 feet or more, your calculation make sense.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next