Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 247.63

+0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: yofal who wrote (122781)	12/9/2011 8:53:41 PM
From: NAG1	Read Replies (1) of 213182

Yofal, This patent story seems like it could be a big deal but it doesn't seem there are many facts out there for people to really report on except for the ruling itself which I have read different things about what it means. If the facts are that Apple made a bid to pay the UCRs for the Mot patents and were rebuffed, then Apple is is in the right and should just have to pay the UCRs for the patents. If Apple is thinking that the patents are not enforceable, I am not sure what path should be taken since there are probably plenty of legal ramifications if things aren't done correctly. If Apple is the one that is just saying they won't pay and these are legal patents, then Apple deserves to be slammed. So far, I have read several different things about what actually is going on and no one seems to have all the facts on this. Part of the reason for this is the secrecy at Apple. But I would have hoped that someone would have done enough digging and would have found out the facts. Neal

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next