SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS)
COMS 0.00130-18.8%Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hua Xue who wrote (10581)11/20/1997 8:40:00 PM
From: santhosh mohan  Read Replies (2) of 45548
 
Glenn and Santhosh, my question(open interests) continues:

Hua:

Perhaps this will make it clear. Let us say COMS hits $95 in early December, and the Options Exchange opens Jan 100 calls for trading. On the very first day of trading, the OI is zero. Now, Joe wants to buy 5 contracts at the asking price. The sale will be made by the MM who now has a short position. The OI is now 5. Subsequently Fred comes along and wants to write 5 contracts. He sells to the MM at the bid price. Now since the MM is closing or reversing his earlier short position, the OI would reduce by 5 to zero. But since Fred is establishing a new position, the OI will remain at 5. So it is not 5+5 = 10 OI.

The question of market manipulation would arise if the contracts are written only by the MM (nobody else doubts COMS hitting 125 <G>). Now the MM would be interested in holding COMS below 100, perhaps by short-selling. Or, Fred could be an institutional investor which is trying to hedge a long position in COMS by writing the call contracts for premium income. Again they would be interested in temporarily holding down the stock. Hope this helps your pursuit of knowledge.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext