Your arguments for Rands objectivism is no different than I see with other religious dogma. And you defend it like defenders of dogma always do. Totally without objectivity, ironically. Your thinking is no different than those you are accusing. How terribly ironic. Same schtick, different dogma.
And it does not occur to you that the great thinkers like Steven Pinker, Noam Chomsky, Russel or Whitehead, Einstein, Dirac, Heisenberg, Fromm, Max Weber, etc are never, ever presented as the last word, but just general knowledge. And anyone of the above would eat Rand for lunch intellectually. |
