International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: whatitis who wrote (27896)	11/21/1997 1:26:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (3) of 35569

Betty, Very nice post. I share many of the concerns regarding the criticisms that have been expressed by the longs of this stock and one may ask then why am I still invested in the company ? Simple because the metals are there and they are there in qualitative proportions. I strongly feel that many of the criticisms need to be addressed. Not the ones that hungry lion and the motley crew put out but the ones that IPM share holders have in regards to their company. Not with words but rather with the success of this project. The shorts have gained control of this thread without question. Some have criticised the longs in this thread for not maintaining the battle or some other foolishness about admitting to being wrong. Well I don't feel I was and I doubt any of the others do either. Market psychology has shifted to the negative and in some regards that is good because without focusing on the problems then solutions will never appear. I voiced my dissatisfaction with the company and past decisions that they have made. This is my attempt at helping in an otherwise difficult situation. I don't believe that many of the longs are posting very much these days because we have grown battle wary. I myself have taken a long evaluation on my beliefs. It is impossible to see into anothers heart and know what they believe, what their convictions or motivations are but I don't believe for a second that Lew or Anne or Matt or any of the other longs are here to mislead or lied to us intentially. I value their input which is not to say that I don't question their conclusions. IPM is a technology play. The exact same way that any of the DD's are. We have the mineralization and that is clear to me. The technology will prevail it is as simple as that. We as share holders can add our input to the company at any time we wish just as I have. Instead of being whiners we should be helping our company to succeed. For example : People here have formed letter writing campaigns to people so that our concerns would be addressed. Why should this be any different ? Why not form one with suggestions or demands to the company stating what we want to see ? Suggest that the $25MM that may be won from the lawsuit with AZDOM be used for a stock buy back to minimize the stock dilution. Evaluate the viability of all stock and assetts that the company holds such as shares in other companies and determine whether it has a high potential of giving the share holders of IPM a profitable return for their money if not then liquidate them. These are the things that will benifit us. Richard Mazz and many others have said that everyone here has an alterior motive and I have felt very much out of place because I couldn't find mine. Well now I finally have one so I am feeling much better. I would like to be elected to have all future press releases approved through me <g>. But now ........ Bambi awaits !!!!!!!!!! If I am not back before, then I wish to offer my greetings to everyone that they relish all that is dear to them and gives thanks for the blessings in their lives. HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND WE ARE ALL RICHER THAN WE KNOW!!!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next