SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IPIC
IPIC 0.00010000.0%Aug 15 3:35 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pancho Villa who wrote (891)11/21/1997 8:40:00 AM
From: NeuroInvestment  Read Replies (1) of 1359
 
There is some misunderstanding regarding the structure of the BEST study here. An independent safety board reviews data from the study every 1-2 months. If they find that there is a statistically significant benefit to the use of the drug established prior to the completion of patient accrual, this would mean that to continue accrual is unethical, because those patients receiving placebo would be exposed to the risk of greater mortality.Since Bextra is similar (albeit with a slightly better risk profile in terms of vasoconstriction) to SmithKline's Coreg, a similar magnitude of effect is anticipated. Coreg's trials were stopped early via the same mechanism, and Tony Butler is simply extrapolating this to the Bextra timeframe (e.g. how many patients does it take to establish statistical validation). There is no 'preliminary efficacy data', it is the Coreg experience that is the template for comparison. If we do not hear of the trial being stopped within the next 3-6 months, that would raise concerns as to Bextra's efficacy compared to Coreg.
NeuroInvestment
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext