SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : The Microcap Kitchen: Stocks 5¢ to $5

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zen_lunatic420 who wrote (106279)12/30/2011 12:59:31 PM
From: Rawnoc  Read Replies (1) of 120405
 
I will respond to this one thing though for fun:

"You fail to mention that NYSDEC issued a Consent Order because JBII didn't obtain the proper permits before beginning operations. The company's attempt to spin this as a positive was really the biggest joke I've seen. As enforcement tools go, a Consent Order is the carrot, next comes the stick."

The problem is the NYSDEC, with one simple phone call, "spun" it as a positive as well. And considering the "enforcement tool" included giving them a "consent order" to build ADDITIONAL PROCESSORS, something they didn't even start yet, it's laughable to call it an enforcement action. As if the NYSDEC said "JBII, we command you to expand your business" -- ROFL!!!!!

I agree that a consent order is NORMALLY an enforcement action. However, it was clearly and obviously used as a tool/loophole to allow JBII to bypass the wait time while a permit processes. They had all the temporary permits in place to begin operations -- the NYSDEC was actively working WITH them during that time. It's further laughable to say "they didn't obtain proper permits before beginning operations" -- LOl -- the NYSDEC was actively on site with them the entire time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext