SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 408.24+2.3%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (85317)12/30/2011 8:52:40 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 218649
 
Yes, my 31 Dec 2011 gold price sooth saying did indeed miss by a little. But missing by daily variation in the 3rd significant figure is not much of a miss. Let's not get too niggardly over such triviality.

Notice that I put my money where my mouth was and sold and bought gold accordingly. It was fun to buy gold after all these decades of talking about gold [I have been watching gold for a third of a century now, but have never participated in the Aztec rituals, though I came close at $323 in the early 21st century, even going to the bullion store in Grafton Road, Auckland, to see what they had on offer].

I still claim the trifecta. Now going for 4 in a row. No doubt what seemed like a high price earlier in the year when the 31 Dec 2012 sooth was issued will seem a tame and lame price by the gold aficionados who saw the price exceeded briefly this year [reaching an all time high an hour or so before I whacked it with a dirty great short putting the fear of Gd* and Mq* in the Aztecs, sending them scuttling for cover, which I did at the recent low].

Mqurice

* Not a tautology as they are not the same person. But if my 31 December 2012 $1,727 sooth is correct, you might reasonably wonder.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext