2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 383.12

+0.8%

Nov 26 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KyrosL who wrote (85407)	1/1/2012 9:35:06 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 218054

my 8-12% accounts for true quality improvements in that folks are choosing to live better, paying more, rather than adjusting for quality per hedonics and layering on top w/ chain dollar, simultaneously doubling subjective quality of cat food and concurrently substituting cat food for lobster i would go w/ shadowstats numbers for macro i would not go for bls numbers for anything needing to be useful i am okay with lots of people going with bls numbers, for another 10 good years you are free to choose your path forward, and if i understand you correctly, you are choosing bls over shadow stats, even as shadow stats are just calculating numbers consistently per 1971 methodology

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next