Well what do you really want, someone who knows what to do, but needs to be coaxed, or someone who has no idea? Forget the indictment and think what is best for the country.
Every single Republican nominee is a full blown clown and their ideas would hurt this country just as much as bush's did. Because they are crazy ideas that only help the rich but are dangerous, like everyone except Paul wanting to start another war with Iran.
And Paul would dismantle our social system, so he is not acceptable either.
At least Obama is smart and a great diplomat. And he appoints smart people. Bush appointed no smart people and neither would the Republican's. Romney would appoint Bolton and the neo cons who are all not only nuts but venal.
<< I think that's a powerful argument against Obama. Here's a man who knows what needs to be done (e.g. the need to have vetoed the unconstitutional NDAA allowing the President to detain and assassinate American citizens), but who for reasons of expediency decides not to do the right thing, not once, but repeatedly.
When someone knows what he should do, but doesn't do it, that is called having a lack of character, moral fiber, or core values. |