SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ISGI ANYONE????

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pamela Cooper who wrote (2550)9/15/1996 2:17:00 AM
From: Ben Geh   of 2665
 
Pamela: I am not able to tell you whether you should dump your stock
on Monday, but I can tell you that reverse splits almost always results
in losses for the one holding the shares. However you'll find all these
stocks already were doing badly in the first place with a history of
falling revenues/earnings and stock prices and the reverse split is
the last ditched futile attempt to save the company. Almost everyone
can come up with countless horror stories and today any mention of a
reverse split would immediately throw the terrified shareholder into
an emotional wreck.

On the other hand there are companies that perform well on the
reverse splits. There are not many but here are some that I cut and paste
from earlier postings in this thread. These are the well managed
companies with good revenues/earnings growth and the splits are well
planned strategies to increase shareholders value...........


>>>>From: Mike Sawyer
OAK was running at about $3 around May '93 when it reversed to around $20. And
today it is in the $30's. But it does not have the high margin that TWT does. It has a
float of about 13M with a total out of about 18M. They manufacture telecom
equipment and devices.

Coda is not real clear because of the lost ticker. But it looks like they had a small
reverse in August of '95 and began to trade at $7. Then it went up to about $7.60
before being taken over in Feb '96.

>>>>From: MARK SIMON
Great turnaround for MDRX (drug industry) -
in mid 1995 stock trading below $1, at that point
management opted for a 1 - 14 reverse split in order to
"attract more attention from Wall Street" The outstanding
shares of 60 million became a float of 4.7 million.
The stock closed friday at 39 3/4 .....Fundamentals is the KEY .
Referenced this info thru The Motley Fool.

>>>>From: Andrew Spurlin
Ben : Check out COOPER CO. (COO) They had a reverse split 5/1
last year and the stock appreciated nicely after about 6-8 months
They were in a good situation for a split,price was down do to legal
problems etc..While earnings were climbing..It took alot of patientce
but it worked out nicely for me !! I am hopefull this will too
How the Preferred are effected is a concern for me especially
after the first of the year when they can file to sell..

>>>>From: Glenn Olsen
I used to play with OAK as it trade from 1 to 1 1/4. Got out before
the reverse split. Went up a ton.
Not all reverses are a negative.
Glenn

In ISGI's case, this tactical plan had long been planned and reported
to the SEC via the SEC filings. These filings are no secret and is open
to anyone despite the claim by some that this is a scam and these people
even wanted to know whether there are any more hidden secrets. All
they have to do is to read the 10Q's and 8K's and they'll find all
the hidden secrets are there including the reverse splits.

After the split the outstanding shares numbers 5.7 million, which is
just too meager to attract any MM's manipulation. The float is just too
tight for MM to play around. There are some who wants to convince you
that Preferred's are not affected by the reversed split and that you
should sell because they are going to cause dilution of anything up
to 100 million shares. Makes the Preferred holders look more like lottery]
players...whenever there's a forward split - cry in despair, whenever
there's a reverse split - jump with joy.

So there you are, as Glenn Olsen says from his own personal experience,
"not all reverses are a negative".

Ben



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext