Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (108309)	1/4/2012 1:21:15 PM
From: BDAZZ	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 197275

describing Paul as … not “…somebody completely incompetent (that) would be able to derail the company” As per previous posts it is simply a guess by any of us to decide what influence or credit Paul can or can't actually take. The idea that Paul is due no credit because Qcom is simply a worldwide, multi billion dollar corporation on auto pilot IMO is ridiculous. I wouldn't call the ex CEO of Nokia incompetent, but he chose to play it safe, sticking to his company's proven model and it was a huge mistake. In contrast Qcom gambled on the coming of the smartphone and shifted the R&D into high gear, and took this company from "promising" to the top of this market. Again, the idea that Paul had nothing to do with this brilliant move that companies like Intel envy is ridiculous. The best way to prove Paul's role would be to replace him at a time that Qcom is at the top of the game. Hey, the ex CEO from Nokia is available.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next