International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: go4it who wrote (27899)	11/21/1997 12:45:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (4) of 35569

<< We have the mineralization and that is clear to me. >> Chuck, We clearly have some mineralization, that is clear to everyone, and has been since December 1995.. Do you mean that we have the mineralization that will permit us to extract 0.25+ opt Au? Do we have the mineralization that will permit us to recover 0.81 opt Au-equivalent? BTW what happened to those 900kg bulk samples that were yielding 0.25+ Au with no degredation? This is a situation in which some words of answer would have been welcomed by the shareholders. Did the bulk test suddenly stop working? Wouldn't that have been negative information that would have to have been released to the public? Clearly the recovery process didn't work when submitted to a third party for verification -- despite what we were told in several press releases. Does this make you uneasy? I'll have something to say about all the vaunted "research" in a day or two. O. H.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next