A blueprint for the future from Ron Paul in 2002. He was spot on. How's that working out for the folks? Voting for more of the same this year? youtube.com Just cut your losses and vote for Ron Paul. He'll beat Obama any time because hordes of Liberals will vote for him too. Even if he doesn't beat Obama, it's unlikely that Romney will and even if he does, it will be more of the same, but too late to do anything about it. If Congress agrees, Ron Paul would enact serious changes in favour of return to constitutional processes which were so fantastically successful for so long.
It seems that few realize what deep doo doo we are in, with umpty Mecha Barbra Streisand southpark.wikia.com $trillions of borrow and hope for change. At this stage, a bit of spare change would be a help for many.
There are still questions to presidential candidates about whether homosexual marriage is a good thing and whether contraceptives should be federalized or something. As Romney explained, it's hardly a question worth allocating 1 second to for presidential candidates who are going to be dealing with the world's biggest financial shambles ever - on an absolute scale.
2012 could yet be the most horrible year in human history. A run on the banks, including the federal reserve, could make life really interesting.
Meanwhile, war with Iran will kick things off. Exxon's profits will be enormous. BP's too. When the straits of Hormuz are a target zone, the price of oil will go through the roof. It's an ill wind that blows nobody good. The oil producers will rub their hands with glee. In the late 1980s a BP colleague and I pretty well predicted "a bullet through the middle east" which would have the effect of raising prices. Sure enough, within a couple of years, Saddam had invaded Kuwait and April Glaspie was allegedly misunderstood.
Mqurice |
