First of all, no one but me has said anything about that or argued that it is plausible, so kindly direct your comments to me, not others in the forum who did not say it and have not attempted to defend my comments. My comments are mine and mine alone, just as everyone is only responsible for his/her own comments, so kindly cease dragging others into something that I said and that I stand behind.
Now, my assertion was that it is at least plausible based on the following considerations, and not only Moochelle's "snorey and stinky" interview...
These are the facts:
- Incest and pedophilia are acceptable and practiced by Muslims under Sharia Law. Obama is a Muslim.
- Obama comes from a family of sexual predators, namely his father and brother. Sexually abusing younger women runs in his family.
- Obama is reported to have an abnormal desire for abnormal sexual practices
- Many victims of incest and pedophilia (and their families) engage in various forms of behavior to mask their secret pain, such as laughing, telling jokes, etc.
Michelle Obama revealed that her daughters were afraid to get into bed with their father because he stinks. She did not indicate if it was morning breath, body odor, or both, but she boldly said, "They don't ever want to get into bed with him."
This begs the question, "Why would a wife reveal something so deeply personal and private as her husband's poor personal hygiene and her daughters' revulsion to him as a result?"
Was it because she is an uncouth imbecile or it because she was masking a secret family pain of something else; perhaps the sexual abuse of her children? It is also plausible that her response was a cover in case a servant ever noticed the girls' unexplained fear of their father in certain situations. For example, if such a servant ever remarked, "Those girls sure are afraid to be alone with their daddy," Michelle's story already has that covered because everyone now knows that he stinks now, right? His girls hate that, right? Therefore, Michelle's story must be regarded as true, because no civilized, loving wife would say something like that if it weren't true, right?
Bottom line: I personally believe that Michelle is simply an uncouth idiot who isn't smart enough to know not to give a public interview and talk about her husband's terrible personal hygiene and her daughters' revulsion to him. However, I am not so naive as to discount the possibility that her response is indicative of something else, perhaps incest, pedophilia, and sexual abuse, especially when considering the other factors.
Buddy, sexual abuse, incest, and pedophilia are not a rare events. All transpire quite often, especially with Muslims and those who have family histories of perpetrating abuse. |
