You right on Krauthammer...He isn't a 'has been'.... OTHER than he HAS BEEN totally favoring Romney....It's so obvious that it hurts....I had hoped he would be more objective.....
Just so you know, right now, I think Romney will be the nominee, but here I agree with Sarah....
we NEED to know everything about these candidates.
Certainly we do after the Media and the Democrats didn't tell us a darn thing about who Obama is, what his background was, what accomplishments he had to date in all of his 45-46 years when he was elected. Other than he was supposed to be a professor (????evidence of this) at Harvard, who taught Constitutional Law (???evidence of this), had a wife that wasn't proud of America UNTIL he was elected...two cute girls, and oh, yeah.....he smoked all sorts of stuff when in college (and for how long?) and he was a community organizer.
And one more thing....wife was constantly whining during the campaign about how poor she thought she was, so where did the Obama's get the money so that he can present himself "one of the rich folks who should pay more taxes." "Hope n Change".....Well he got half that right ....he's changed things, that's for sure. So much so he can't even bring them up in the SOTU.
Romney needs to make perfectly clear exactly what is wrong (in his opinion) item by item, with the ENTIRE Obamacare mess, and EXACTLY what he will do about it.
So does Newt. |
